Patrick Schmolzer vs Christian Johansson, Gothenburg 2005, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-4 6-4Venue and conditions
Venue not available
Indoor hardCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksAltitudeElevation unavailable
Head to head
1Schmolzer
0Johansson
1 meeting- GothenburgRound of 16 · 2005HardThis matchPatrick SchmolzerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Christian JohanssonSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Form and path
Patrick Schmolzer1–5
Salzburg CHHard
Bad WaltersdorfClay
- LRound of 32Blaz RolaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Patrick SchmolzerSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
WelsClay
- LRound of 32Michal PazickySets won: 2Set 1: 65Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Patrick SchmolzerSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 0Set 3: 1
PörtschachClay
- LRound of 32Philip LangSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Patrick SchmolzerSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
BergheimCarpet
- LRound of 16Marko TkalecSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Patrick SchmolzerSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
Christian Johansson1–5
FalunHard
- LRound of 16Ervin EleskovicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Christian JohanssonSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
- WRound of 32Christian JohanssonSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Eric ClaessonSets won: 0Set 1: 63Set 2: 0
GothenburgHard
- LRound of 32Peter GojowczykSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Christian JohanssonSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
GothenburgHard
- LRound of 32Martin PedersenSets won: 2Set 1: 65Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Christian JohanssonSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 4
VierumäkiClay
- LRound of 32Niklas BuchtSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Christian JohanssonSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.