Matthias Bachinger vs Daniel Brands, Nuremberg 2005, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Clay

Final

Matthias Bachinger

WinnerRank #1763

Bachinger won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 15–7

Set 27–6³

Set 36–3

Daniel Brands

LostRank #1055

Venue

Venue not available

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Head to head

5Bachinger

5Brands

10 meetings

Clay 4–1Hard 1–3Carpet 0–1

NurembergSemifinal · 2005ClayThis match
Matthias Bachinger
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Daniel Brands
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 6³Set 3: 3
Quimper ChallengerRound of 16 · 31 Jan 2019Hard
Matthias Bachinger
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 7⁸Set 3: 6
Daniel Brands
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6⁶Set 3: 3
MunichQualifying R1 · 23 Apr 2016Clay
Matthias Bachinger
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Daniel Brands
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Heilbronn ChallengerRound of 16 · 14 May 2015Clay
Matthias Bachinger
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁹
Daniel Brands
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6⁷
ViennaQualifying R3 · 15 Oct 2012Hard
Daniel Brands
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 2Set 3: 6
Matthias Bachinger
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
BucharestQuarterfinal · 27 Apr 2012Clay
Matthias Bachinger
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Daniel Brands
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Form and path

Matthias Bachinger2–4

TrimbachCarpet

LRound of 32
Jonas Schaer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 0Set 3: 6
Matthias Bachinger
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

CreteilHard

LQualifying R1
Mayeul Darras
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 1Set 3: 10
Matthias Bachinger
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 6Set 3: 8

Koblenz CHHard

LQualifying R1
Giovanni Oradini
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6⁴Set 3: 7
Matthias Bachinger
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 5

NusslochCarpet

Daniel Brands3–3

WimbledonGrass

s HertogenboschGrass

Surbiton CHGrass

LRound of 32
Feliciano Lopez
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Daniel Brands
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Matthias Bachinger vs Daniel Brands, Nuremberg 2005, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research