Jeroen Masson vs Philipp Marx, Amersfoort 2005, Qualifying R1

Final

Jeroen Masson

WinnerATP: 1070

Masson won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–4

Philipp Marx

LostATP: 1856

Sportpark Bokkeduinen — Dutch Open tournament groundsAmersfoort, NED

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

2.195.4Slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

21°CMild

15km/hGentle

76%Humid

5mSea level

Head to head

3Masson

0Marx

3 meetings

Clay 1–0Carpet 2–0

AmersfoortQualifying R1 · 16 Jul 2005ClayThis match
Jeroen Masson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Philipp Marx
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
HeilbronnQualifying R2 · 22 Jan 2006Carpet
Jeroen Masson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Philipp Marx
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
KaarstRound of 16 · 2005Carpet
Jeroen Masson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Philipp Marx
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jeroen Masson vs Philipp Marx, Amersfoort 2005, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research