Artemon Apostu Efremov vs Jacob Adaktusson, Düsseldorf 2005, Semifinal
Final score
Final
6-3 6-3Venue and conditions
Venue not available
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditions
Forecast not yet available
Head to head
0Efremov
1Adaktusson
1 meeting- DüsseldorfSemifinal · 2005ClayThis matchJacob AdaktussonSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Artemon Apostu EfremovSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
Form and path
Artemon Apostu Efremov5–1
ChitilaClay
- LRound of 32Dragos Nicolae MadarasSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Artemon Apostu EfremovSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 1
- WQualifying R3Artemon Apostu EfremovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Luca George TatomirSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
- WQualifying R1Artemon Apostu EfremovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ioan Dan AbrudanSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
BucharestClay
BucharestClay
- WQualifying R3Artemon Apostu EfremovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Bastian ParadaSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0
Jacob Adaktusson2–4
StockholmHard
- LRound of 32Liam BroadySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jacob AdaktussonSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R2Jacob AdaktussonSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Mert AltinalevSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- WQualifying R1Jacob AdaktussonSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Eric SamuelssonSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
StockholmHard
DanderydHard
- LRound of 32Clement GeensSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jacob AdaktussonSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
FalunHard
- LRound of 16Michael GrantSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Jacob AdaktussonSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 5
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.