Lauri Kiiski vs Jakub Hasek, Bytom 2005, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay

Final

Lauri Kiiski

LostRank #1603

Hasek won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 23–6

Jakub Hasek

WinnerRank #1204

Venue

Górnik Bytom Tennis Club

Bytom, POL· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

282 m

Low

Head to head

0Kiiski

1Hasek

1 meeting

BytomQuarterfinal · 2005ClayThis match
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Lauri Kiiski
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Form and path

Lauri Kiiski2–4

Tampere CHClay

LQualifying R1
Tristan Lamasine
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Lauri Kiiski
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

HyvinkaaClay

Tampere CHClay

LRound of 32
Cem Ilkel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Lauri Kiiski
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Tampere CHClay

Jakub Hasek3–3

LeimenHard

LRound of 32
Patrick Schmolzer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

OpoleClay

LRound of 32
Marko Mokrzycki
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 0
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
Jakub Hasek · Retired

BratislavaClay

LSemifinal
Jan Kroslak
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 7⁷
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6²Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁴
WQuarterfinal
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Igor Zelenay
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6²Set 2: 2
WRound of 16
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Eddy Chala
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 0
WRound of 32
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tomas Toman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Lauri Kiiski vs Jakub Hasek, Bytom 2005, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research