Amir Hadad vs Radim Zitko, Furth Challenger 2005, Qualifying R3

Challenger · Qualifying R3 · Clay · Mon 30 May

Final

Amir Hadad

WinnerRank #1591

Hadad won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–1

Radim Zitko

LostRank #1059

Venue

TV 1860 Furth (Franken Challenge / Schickedanz Open)

Furth, GER· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

21 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

76%

Humid

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

301 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Hadad

0Zitko

2 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 1–0

Furth ChallengerQualifying R3 · 30 May 2005ClayThis match
Amir Hadad
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Radim Zitko
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
NeversQuarterfinal · 2005Hard
Amir Hadad
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Radim Zitko
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Amir Hadad vs Radim Zitko, Furth Challenger 2005, Qualifying R3

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research