Jan Frode Andersen vs Brian Baker, Ettlingen Challenger 2005, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 26 May

Final

Jan Frode Andersen

LostRank #1555

Baker won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 16–7⁴

Set 24–6

Brian Baker

WinnerRank #1133

Venue

Tennis-Club Ettlingen

Ettlingen, GER· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

8 km/h

Light

Humidity

68%

Moderate

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

167 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Andersen

1Baker

2 meetings

Clay 0–1Hard 1–0

Ettlingen ChallengerRound of 16 · 26 May 2005ClayThis match
Brian Baker
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Jan Frode Andersen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 4
Waikoloa ChallengerRound of 16 · 29 Jan 2004Hard
Jan Frode Andersen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6³Set 2: 6Set 3: 7
Brian Baker
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 2Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Frode Andersen vs Brian Baker, Ettlingen Challenger 2005, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research