Harsh Mankad vs Nathan Healey, Oxford 2005, Final

FUTURES · Final · Grass

Final

Harsh Mankad

LostRank #1049

Healey won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 25–7

Nathan Healey

WinnerRank #1134

Venue

Venue not available

Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Head to head

2Mankad

1Healey

3 meetings

Grass 1–1Hard 1–0

OxfordFinal · 2005GrassThis match
Nathan Healey
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Harsh Mankad
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
Tulsa ChallengerRound of 32 · 25 Sept 2006Hard
Harsh Mankad
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6
Nathan Healey
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
NottinghamQualifying R3 · 12 Jun 2005Grass
Harsh Mankad
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Nathan Healey
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 1

Form and path

Harsh Mankad1–5

Tanger CHClay

LQualifying R1
Joao Sousa
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Harsh Mankad
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Sacramento CHHard

LQualifying R1
Filip Krajinovic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Harsh Mankad
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 4

Todi CHClay

LQualifying R1
Pavel Katliarov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3
Harsh Mankad
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3
Harsh Mankad · Retired

Orleans CHHard

New Delhi IV CHHard

LRound of 16
Miles Armstrong
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 5Set 3: 6
Harsh Mankad
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6¹Set 2: 7Set 3: 4

Nathan Healey2–4

LoomisHard

LRound of 32
Lester Cook
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nathan Healey
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Yuba City CHHard

LQualifying R1
Tim Smyczek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nathan Healey
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Louisville CHHard

Calabasas CHHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Harsh Mankad vs Nathan Healey, Oxford 2005, Final

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research