Federico Luzzi vs Edouard Roger-Vasselin, Rome Challenger 2005, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Clay · Thu 28 Apr

Final

Federico Luzzi

WinnerRank #465

Luzzi won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 27–6⁹

Edouard Roger-Vasselin

LostRank #806

Venue

Tennis Club Garden

Rome, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

13 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

77%

Humid

Temperature

22°C

Warm

Altitude

63 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Luzzi

0Roger-Vasselin

2 meetings

Rome ChallengerQuarterfinal · 28 Apr 2005ClayThis match
Federico Luzzi
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7¹¹
Edouard Roger-Vasselin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6⁹
Banja Luka ChallengerRound of 32 · 19 Sept 2006Clay
Federico Luzzi
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Edouard Roger-Vasselin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Federico Luzzi vs Edouard Roger-Vasselin, Rome Challenger 2005, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research