Wayne Arthurs vs Igor Andreev, Munich 2005, Round of 16

ATP Intl Series · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 28 Apr

Final

Wayne Arthurs

WinnerRank #3684.2423%Upset

Arthurs won in 3 sets · 2h 12m

2–1

Set 16–4

Set 26–7⁵

Set 37–6³

Igor Andreev

LostRank #10161.2777%

Venue

MTTC Iphitos

Munich, GER· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

1.0vs last year

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

73%

Humid

Temperature

16°C

Mild

Altitude

499 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Match stats

2h 12m

16Aces12

3Double faults1

77Service points won76

17Service games played17

17Service games won16

17Return games played17

0/0Break points saved75%3/4

1/425%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Arthurs

0Andreev

1 meeting

MunichRound of 16 · 28 Apr 2005ClayThis match
Wayne Arthurs
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁵Set 3: 7⁷
Igor Andreev
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6³

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Wayne Arthurs vs Igor Andreev, Munich 2005, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research