Yuri Schukin vs Daniel Koellerer, Barletta Challenger 2005, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 24 Mar

Final

Yuri Schukin

LostRank #776

Koellerer won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 21–6

Daniel Koellerer

WinnerRank #385

Venue

Circolo Tennis Hugo Simmen

Barletta, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

85%

Very humid

Temperature

18°C

Mild

Altitude

17 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Schukin

2Koellerer

2 meetings

Clay 0–1Hard 0–1

Barletta ChallengerRound of 16 · 24 Mar 2005ClayThis match
Daniel Koellerer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Yuri Schukin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
Seoul ChallengerRound of 32 · 23 Oct 2007Hard
Daniel Koellerer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Yuri Schukin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Yuri Schukin vs Daniel Koellerer, Barletta Challenger 2005, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research