Nicolas Lapentti vs Ramon Delgado, Aracaju Challenger 2004, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 4 Dec

Final

Nicolas Lapentti

WinnerRank #885

Lapentti won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 14–6

Set 26–4

Set 36–2

Ramon Delgado

LostRank #518

Venue

Federacao Sergipana de Tenis

Aracaju, BRA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

21 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

77%

Humid

Temperature

29°C

Warm

Altitude

7 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Lapentti

0Delgado

2 meetings

Aracaju ChallengerSemifinal · 4 Dec 2004ClayThis match
Nicolas Lapentti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Ramon Delgado
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 2
Vina del MarRound of 16 · 2002Clay
Nicolas Lapentti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Ramon Delgado
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nicolas Lapentti vs Ramon Delgado, Aracaju Challenger 2004, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research