Ramon Delgado vs Brian Dabul, Aracaju Challenger 2004, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 2 Dec

Final

Ramon Delgado

WinnerRank #518

Delgado won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–0

Set 25–7

Set 36–2

Brian Dabul

LostRank #1036

Venue

Federacao Sergipana de Tenis

Aracaju, BRA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

21 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

78%

Humid

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

7 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Delgado

0Dabul

2 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 1–0

Aracaju ChallengerRound of 16 · 2 Dec 2004ClayThis match
Ramon Delgado
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6
Brian Dabul
Sets won: 1Set 1: 0Set 2: 7Set 3: 2
Salinas ChallengerQuarterfinal · 13 Mar 2008Hard
Ramon Delgado
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6⁶Set 3: 7
Brian Dabul
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 7⁸Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ramon Delgado vs Brian Dabul, Aracaju Challenger 2004, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research