Zack Fleishman vs Christopher Lam, Honolulu 2004, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard

Final

Zack Fleishman

WinnerRank #1467

Fleishman won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–3

Christopher Lam

LostRank #1538

Venue

Diamond Head Tennis Center + Ala Moana Park

Honolulu, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

3 m

Sea level

Head to head

1Fleishman

0Lam

1 meeting

HonoluluRound of 16 · 2004HardThis match
Zack Fleishman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Christopher Lam
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Form and path

Zack Fleishman0–6

US OpenHard

LQualifying R1
Vincent Millot
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Zack Fleishman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 2

Canada MastersHard

LQualifying R1
Alejandro Falla
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6²Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Zack Fleishman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 2Set 3: 2

Los AngelesHard

LQualifying R1
Sahr Timothy Kpulun
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3
Zack Fleishman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
Zack Fleishman · Retired

WimbledonGrass

LQualifying R1
Marc Gicquel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Zack Fleishman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

US OpenHard

LQualifying R1
Mikhail Kukushkin
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Zack Fleishman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Australian OpenHard

LQualifying R1
Lukas Dlouhy
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Zack Fleishman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0

Christopher Lam0–6

Shingle SpringsHard

LRound of 32
Nicholas John Andrews
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Christopher Lam
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 2

TampaClay

LRound of 32
Sekou Bangoura
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Christopher Lam
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 2

Orange ParkClay

LRound of 32
Adam El Mihdawy
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Christopher Lam
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

Vero BeachClay

LRound of 32
Chase Buchanan
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Christopher Lam
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Little RockHard

LRound of 32
Bryan Wooten
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Christopher Lam
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

San JoseHard

LQualifying R1
Scott Oudsema
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Christopher Lam
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Zack Fleishman vs Christopher Lam, Honolulu 2004, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research