Jan Mertl vs Jan Stancik, Průhonice 2004, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard

Final

Jan Mertl

WinnerRank #1844

Mertl won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 17–6⁴

Set 26–3

Jan Stancik

LostRank #1860

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

—

Elevation unavailable

Indoor venue, weather not factored

No reading

Head to head

1Mertl

1Stancik

2 meetings

Hard 1–0Clay 0–1

PrůhoniceRound of 16 · 2004HardThis match
Jan Mertl
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 3
PiešťanyRound of 16 · 2010Clay
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7
Jan Mertl
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 5

Form and path

Jan Mertl3–3

VogauClay

LRound of 32
Laurent Lokoli
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Jan Mertl
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

AntalyaClay

LouleHard

Jan Stancik2–4

TrnavaClay

LRound of 32
Filip Brtnicky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4
Jan Stancik · Retired

MichalovceClay

LRound of 16
Jan Blecha
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 7
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 5
WRound of 32
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ljubomir Celebic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Tatranská LomnicaClay

LRound of 16
Samuel Bensoussan
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
WRound of 32
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 7
Pirmin Haenle
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 1Set 3: 5

PorečClay

LQualifying R2
Tomislav Draganja
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Mertl vs Jan Stancik, Průhonice 2004, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research