Jan Hajek vs Simone Bolelli, Palermo 2004, Qualifying R1

ATP Intl Series · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sat 25 Sept

Final · Retired

Jan Hajek

LostRank #1199

Bolelli won · Retired

0–0

Set 10–3

Simone Bolelli

WinnerRank #1391

Venue

Circolo Tennis Palermo

Palermo, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Slow

2.0vs last year

Wind

21 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

71%

Humid

Temperature

23°C

Warm

Altitude

32 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Hajek

3Bolelli

3 meetings

PalermoQualifying R1 · 25 Sept 2004ClayThis match
Simone Bolelli
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3
Jan Hajek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0
Jan Hajek · Retired
Oberstaufen ChallengerQuarterfinal · 25 Jul 2014Clay
Simone Bolelli
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jan Hajek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
Manerbio ChallengerRound of 32 · 23 Aug 2011Clay
Simone Bolelli
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jan Hajek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Hajek vs Simone Bolelli, Palermo 2004, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research