Mathias Hellstrom vs Mikael Ekman, Gothenburg 2004, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard

Final

Mathias Hellstrom

LostRank #1497

Ekman won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 16–7⁸

Set 23–6

Mikael Ekman

WinnerRank #999

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

—

Elevation unavailable

Indoor venue, weather not factored

No reading

Head to head

0Hellstrom

1Ekman

1 meeting

GothenburgRound of 16 · 2004HardThis match
Mikael Ekman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7¹⁰Set 2: 6
Mathias Hellstrom
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁸Set 2: 3

Form and path

Mathias Hellstrom2–3

GothenburgThis week

WRound of 32
Mathias Hellstrom
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ross Hutchins
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1

BastadClay

LQualifying R1
Ervin Eleskovic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7⁷
Mathias Hellstrom
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6¹Set 2: 6⁵

Bagnères-de-BigorreHard

LRound of 32
Sebastian Louis
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6
Mathias Hellstrom
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3
Mathias Hellstrom · Retired

Manerbio CHClay

Mikael Ekman1–5

Helsinki CHHard

LQualifying R1
Mikhail Elgin
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 6
Mikael Ekman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 4

FalunHard

LRound of 32
Arvid Puranen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Mikael Ekman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6³

BastadClay

NorrköpingHard

LRound of 32
Greg Jones
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Mikael Ekman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

LinköpingHard

LFinal
Daniel Elsner
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Mikael Ekman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Mathias Hellstrom vs Mikael Ekman, Gothenburg 2004, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research