Timo Nieminen vs Tomislav Peric, Szczecin 2004, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-2 7-6(4)Venue and conditions
Szczecin Tennis ClubSzczecin, POL
ClayCourt speed93.1Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Nieminen
0Peric
1 meeting- SzczecinQuarterfinal · 2004ClayThis matchTimo NieminenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Tomislav PericSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 64
Form and path
Timo Nieminen0–6
Tampere CHClay
TallinnClay
- LRound of 32Ivan NedelkoSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Timo NieminenSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 4
BastadClay
AlkmaarClay
- LRound of 32Mitchell KruegerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Timo NieminenSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0
AmstelveenClay
- LRound of 32Ricardo HocevarSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Timo NieminenSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 611
BåstadClay
- LRound of 32Jacob AdaktussonSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Timo NieminenSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
Tomislav Peric2–4
Manta CHHard
UmagClay
Manchester CHGrass
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.