Sebo Kiss vs Kamil Capkovic, Zagreb 2004, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
2-6 6-4 6-0Venue and conditions
Venue not available
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditions
Forecast not yet available
Head to head
1Kiss
2Capkovic
3 meetings- ZagrebQuarterfinal · 2004ClayThis matchKamil CapkovicSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Sebo KissSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 0
- ViennaSemifinal · 2008ClayKamil CapkovicSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Sebo KissSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
- BudaorsQualifying R1 · 12 Jul 2003ClaySebo KissSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Kamil CapkovicSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
Form and path
Sebo Kiss3–3
Cordenons CHClay
Zagreb CHClay
ViennaClay
- LSemifinalKamil CapkovicSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Sebo KissSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
- WQuarterfinalSebo KissSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Patrick TaubertSets won: 0Set 1: 66Set 2: 2
- WRound of 16Sebo KissSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Karel TriskaSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 64
Kamil Capkovic4–2
TrnavaClay
- LRound of 16Pietro LicciardiSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Kamil CapkovicSets won: 0Set 1: 63Set 2: 2
- WRound of 32Kamil CapkovicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Isa MammetgulyyevSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2
PiešťanyClay
- LRound of 32Filip HoranskySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Kamil CapkovicSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R3Kamil CapkovicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Scott PuodziunasSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R2Kamil CapkovicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michal SeleckySets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R1Kamil CapkovicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Marek GengelSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.