Ladislav Chramosta vs Konstantin Kremeshkov, Samarkand Challenger 2004, Round of 32

Challenger · Round of 32 · Clay · Tue 17 Aug

Final

Ladislav Chramosta

WinnerRank #1747

Chramosta won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–1

Konstantin Kremeshkov

LostRank #1481

Venue

Tennis Club Dinamo, Samarkand

Samarkand, UZB· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

15 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

46%

Comfortable

Temperature

33°C

Hot

Altitude

697 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Chramosta

0Kremeshkov

1 meeting

Samarkand ChallengerRound of 32 · 17 Aug 2004ClayThis match
Ladislav Chramosta
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Konstantin Kremeshkov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

Form and path

Ladislav Chramosta

No recent matches recorded.

Konstantin Kremeshkov3–2

St Petersburg CHClay

Saransk CHClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ladislav Chramosta vs Konstantin Kremeshkov, Samarkand Challenger 2004, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research