Nicolas Devilder vs Daniel Gimeno Traver, Cordenons Challenger 2004, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 14 Aug

Final

Nicolas Devilder

LostRank #1071

Traver won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 22–6

Daniel Gimeno Traver

WinnerRank #1222

Venue

Eurosporting Cordenons

Cordenons, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

8 km/h

Light

Humidity

73%

Humid

Temperature

26°C

Warm

Altitude

26 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Devilder

1Traver

2 meetings

Cordenons ChallengerSemifinal · 14 Aug 2004ClayThis match
Daniel Gimeno Traver
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nicolas Devilder
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
Belo Horizonte 2 ChallengerSemifinal · 27 Oct 2007Clay
Nicolas Devilder
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Daniel Gimeno Traver
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6³Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nicolas Devilder vs Daniel Gimeno Traver, Cordenons Challenger 2004, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research