Alexander Hartman vs Juho Paukku, Jūrmala 2004, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
7-6(7) 2-6 6-1Venue and conditions
Lielupe Tennis CentreJūrmala, LAT
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
0Hartman
1Paukku
1 meeting- JūrmalaQuarterfinal · 2004ClayThis matchJuho PaukkuSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 2Set 3: 6Alexander HartmanSets won: 1Set 1: 67Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
Form and path
Alexander Hartman1–5
Helsinki CHHard
Kolding CHCarpet
StockholmHard
GothenburgHard
- LRound of 32Mikael EkmanSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Alexander HartmanSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
Juho Paukku4–2
Helsinki CHHard
HelsinkiClay
- LSemifinalMicke KontinenSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Juho PaukkuSets won: 0Set 1: 61Set 2: 2
- WQuarterfinalJuho PaukkuSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Maxime TabatruongSets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
- WRound of 16Juho PaukkuSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Xin GaoSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 65
- WRound of 32Juho PaukkuSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jakub LustykSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
- WQualifying R2Juho PaukkuSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Henrik SinkkoSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.