Ivan Navarro vs Paul Henri Mathieu, Segovia Challenger 2004, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 31 Jul

Final

Ivan Navarro

LostRank #1929

Mathieu won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 16–7⁵

Set 26–7⁴

Paul Henri Mathieu

WinnerRank #914

Venue

Complejo Deportivo Pedro Munoz

Segovia, ESP· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

16 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

43%

Comfortable

Temperature

30°C

Warm

Altitude

1201 m

High

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Navarro

1Mathieu

2 meetings

Hard 0–1Clay 1–0

Segovia ChallengerSemifinal · 31 Jul 2004HardThis match
Paul Henri Mathieu
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7⁷
Ivan Navarro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6⁴
BucharestRound of 32 · 10 Sept 2008Clay
Ivan Navarro
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁵Set 3: 6
Paul Henri Mathieu
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ivan Navarro vs Paul Henri Mathieu, Segovia Challenger 2004, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research