Bastian Gronefeld vs Johannes Ager, Kramsach 2004, Semifinal
Final score
Final
6-3 6-1Venue and conditions
TC KramsachKramsach, AUT
ClayCourt speed91.4Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
0Gronefeld
1Ager
1 meeting- KramsachSemifinal · 2004ClayThis matchJohannes AgerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Bastian GronefeldSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
Form and path
Bastian Gronefeld2–4
HalleGrass
Groningen CHHard
Saint-DizierHard
- LRound of 32Andreas BeckSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Bastian GronefeldSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
MadridHard
- LRound of 32Marco MirneggSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Bastian GronefeldSets won: 0Set 1: 66Set 2: 68
FriedbergClay
- LQuarterfinalEvgeny KorolevSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Bastian GronefeldSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
- WRound of 16Bastian GronefeldSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alexander FlockSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Johannes Ager5–1
Vaduz, LiechtensteinCarpet
- LSemifinalGleb SakharovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Johannes AgerSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WQuarterfinalJohannes AgerSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 1Set 3: 7Gero KretschmerSets won: 1Set 1: 62Set 2: 6Set 3: 64
- WRound of 16Johannes AgerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Henri LaaksonenSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
- WRound of 32Johannes AgerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Bastian TrinkerSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1
ÜberlingenClay
- WFinalJohannes AgerSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Dennis BloemkeSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 5
- WSemifinalJohannes AgerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nils LangerSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.