Lauri Kiiski vs Adrian Cruciat, Câmpina 2004, Semifinal
Final score
Final
6-2 6-2Venue and conditions
Venue not available
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditions
Forecast not yet available
Head to head
0Kiiski
1Cruciat
1 meeting- CâmpinaSemifinal · 2004ClayThis matchAdrian CruciatSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Lauri KiiskiSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
Form and path
Lauri Kiiski2–4
Tampere CHClay
HyvinkaaClay
Tampere CHClay
Adrian Cruciat4–2
Arad CHClay
BucharestClay
- LRound of 16Yannik ReuterSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Adrian CruciatSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 3
- WRound of 32Adrian CruciatSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Maxime TchoutakianSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 3
- WQualifying R3Adrian CruciatSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Michal MilkoSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 65
- WQualifying R2Adrian CruciatSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Florin BarbuSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.