Jasper Smit vs Victor Crivoi, Câmpina 2004, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay

Final

Jasper Smit

WinnerRank #706

Smit won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 17–6⁵

Set 27–6⁴

Victor Crivoi

LostRank #1921

Venue

Venue not available

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Head to head

1Smit

0Crivoi

1 meeting

CâmpinaQuarterfinal · 2004ClayThis match
Jasper Smit
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7⁷
Victor Crivoi
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6⁴

Form and path

Jasper Smit5–1

Scheveningen CHClay

Victor Crivoi4–2

Curtea de ArgesClay

LRound of 32
Nicolae Frunza
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Victor Crivoi
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 4Set 3: 4

BucharestClay

BrasovClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jasper Smit vs Victor Crivoi, Câmpina 2004, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research