James Auckland vs Daniel Kiernan, Nottingham 2004, Qualifying R2

Final

James Auckland

LostATP: 1461

Kiernan won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 26–7⁴

Daniel Kiernan

WinnerUnranked

Nottingham Tennis CentreNottingham, GBR

Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

0.8102.5Average

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

18°CMild

27km/hModerate

71%Humid

26mSea level

Head to head

0Auckland

1Kiernan

1 meeting

NottinghamQualifying R2 · 12 Jun 2004GrassThis match
Daniel Kiernan
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7
James Auckland
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

James Auckland vs Daniel Kiernan, Nottingham 2004, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research