James Auckland vs Matthew Smith, Surbiton Challenger 2004, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Grass · Sat 29 May

Final

James Auckland

LostRank #1461

Smith won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 24–6

Matthew Smith

WinnerRank #1402

Venue

Surbiton Racket & Fitness Club

Surbiton, GBR· Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

18 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

73%

Humid

Temperature

19°C

Mild

Altitude

33 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Auckland

1Smith

2 meetings

Grass 0–1Hard 1–0

Surbiton ChallengerQualifying R1 · 29 May 2004GrassThis match
Matthew Smith
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
James Auckland
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
WrexhamRound of 16 · 2004Hard
James Auckland
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Matthew Smith
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

James Auckland vs Matthew Smith, Surbiton Challenger 2004, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research