Jan Hernych vs Ivo Minar, Prague Challenger 2004, Final

Challenger · Final · Clay · Sat 22 May

Final

Jan Hernych

WinnerRank #1606

Hernych won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–4

Ivo Minar

LostRank #1784

Venue

I. ČLTK Praha

Prague, CZE· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

16 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

13°C

Mild

Altitude

187 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Hernych

1Minar

3 meetings

Prague ChallengerFinal · 22 May 2004ClayThis match
Jan Hernych
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ivo Minar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
Kosice ChallengerRound of 16 · 13 May 2004Clay
Jan Hernych
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ivo Minar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
Kosice ChallengerQualifying R2 · 11 May 2003Clay
Ivo Minar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jan Hernych
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Hernych vs Ivo Minar, Prague Challenger 2004, Final

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research