Peter Wessels vs Massimo Dellacqua, Sanremo Challenger 2004, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 13 May

Final

Peter Wessels

WinnerRank #987

Wessels won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–3

Set 25–7

Set 36–4

Massimo Dellacqua

LostRank #1460

Venue

Tennis Sanremo

Sanremo, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

19 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

77%

Humid

Temperature

18°C

Mild

Altitude

32 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Wessels

0Dellacqua

2 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 1–0

Sanremo ChallengerRound of 16 · 13 May 2004ClayThis match
Peter Wessels
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6
Massimo Dellacqua
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 4
Bolton ChallengerQuarterfinal · 22 Oct 2004Hard
Peter Wessels
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7¹¹
Massimo Dellacqua
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6⁹

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Peter Wessels vs Massimo Dellacqua, Sanremo Challenger 2004, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research