Young Jun Kim vs John Paul Fruttero, Seogwipo 2004, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard

Final

Young Jun Kim

LostRank #1720

Fruttero won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 16–7⁴

Set 22–6

John Paul Fruttero

WinnerRank #1231

Venue

Seogwipo Municipal Tennis Courts

Seogwipo, KOR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

78 m

Low

Head to head

0Kim

1Fruttero

1 meeting

SeogwipoQuarterfinal · 2004HardThis match
John Paul Fruttero
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Young Jun Kim
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 2

Form and path

Young Jun Kim4–2

NonthaburiHard

LQualifying R2
Marc Polmans
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Young Jun Kim
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2
WQualifying R1
Young Jun Kim
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Congsup Congcar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

NonthaburiHard

LRound of 16
Hiroki Kondo
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 6
Young Jun Kim
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 4
WRound of 32
Young Jun Kim
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Chayanon Kaewsuto
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 6³
WQualifying R2
Young Jun Kim
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ting Yu Chuang
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0
WQualifying R1
Young Jun Kim
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Roy Hobbs
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

John Paul Fruttero0–6

Baotou CHClay

LRound of 64
Runhao Hua
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
John Paul Fruttero
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Yokkaichi CHHard

LRound of 64
Toshihide Matsui
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7¹⁵
John Paul Fruttero
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6¹³

Binghamton CHHard

LRound of 32
Alejandro Tabilo
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
John Paul Fruttero
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5

Noumea CHHard

LQualifying R1
Sem Verbeek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
John Paul Fruttero
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Chengdu CHHard

LQualifying R1
Xin Gao
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7⁸
John Paul Fruttero
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁶

Toyota CHCarpet

LRound of 32
Yuichi Sugita
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
John Paul Fruttero
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Young Jun Kim vs John Paul Fruttero, Seogwipo 2004, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research