Sergei Krotiouk vs Lauri Kiiski, Pitești 2004, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay

Final

Sergei Krotiouk

LostRank #1905

Kiiski won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 16–3

Set 25–7

Set 36–7⁶

Lauri Kiiski

WinnerRank #1603

Venue

Venue not available

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Head to head

0Krotiouk

1Kiiski

1 meeting

PiteștiRound of 16 · 2004This match
Lauri Kiiski
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 7⁸
Sergei Krotiouk
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6⁶

Form and path

Sergei Krotiouk1–5

PrestonHard

LRound of 32
Alexander Ward
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Sergei Krotiouk
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 3

GlasgowHard

LQualifying R2
Romain Bauvy
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sergei Krotiouk
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

BelgaumHard

LRound of 32
Colin Van Beem
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sergei Krotiouk
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

DharwadHard

LRound of 16
Colin Van Beem
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁶Set 3: 6
Sergei Krotiouk
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁸Set 3: 2
WRound of 32
Sergei Krotiouk
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Lorenz Ilg
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

DavanagereHard

LRound of 32
Colin Van Beem
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sergei Krotiouk
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Lauri Kiiski2–4

Tampere CHClay

LQualifying R1
Tristan Lamasine
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Lauri Kiiski
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

HyvinkaaClay

Tampere CHClay

LRound of 32
Cem Ilkel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Lauri Kiiski
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Tampere CHClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sergei Krotiouk vs Lauri Kiiski, Pitești 2004, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research