Tim Henman vs Tomas Cakl, Rotterdam 2004, Round of 16

ATP Intl Gold · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 19 Feb

Final

Tim Henman

WinnerRank #615

Henman won in 2 sets · 1h 4m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–4

Tomas Cakl

LostRank #1082

Venue

Rotterdam Ahoy

Rotterdam, NED· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

1.5vs last year

Altitude

4 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

1h 4m

8Aces1

3Double faults2

38Service points won32

9Service games played9

9Service games won6

9Return games played9

4/4100%Break points saved63%5/8

3/838%Break points converted0%0/4

Head to head

1Henman

0Cakl

1 meeting

RotterdamRound of 16 · 19 Feb 2004HardThis match
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tomas Cakl
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tim Henman vs Tomas Cakl, Rotterdam 2004, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research