Jeff Salzenstein def. Kevin Kim 6-3 6-4

Back

Memphis

ATP Intl Gold · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 14 Feb

Final

Jeff Salzenstein

WinnerUSA · Rank #1364

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–4

Kevin Kim

LostUSA · Rank #1213

Salzenstein won in 2 sets

Venue and conditions

At the match

Venue

Racquet Club of Memphis

Memphis, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

1.5vs last year

Altitude

94 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

7Salzenstein

6Kim

13 meetings

Hard 6–5Clay 1–1

MemphisQualifying R1 · 14 Feb 2004HardThis match
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kevin Kim
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Tallahassee ChallengerRound of 32 · 3 Apr 2006Hard
Kevin Kim
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 2
Dnepropetrovsk ChallengerRound of 16 · 17 Nov 2004Hard
Kevin Kim
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 0
Roland GarrosQualifying R2 · 22 May 2003Clay
Kevin Kim
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
Aptos ChallengerRound of 32 · 2003Hard
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁷Set 3: 7⁷
Kevin Kim
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁹Set 3: 6⁴
San Luis Potosi ChallengerRound of 16 · 2003Clay
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kevin Kim
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Explore player performance in the conditions, compare recent form and inspect the matches behind each number.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Explore Pro

Back

Memphis

ATP Intl Gold · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 14 Feb

Final

Jeff Salzenstein

WinnerUSA · Rank #1364

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–4

Kevin Kim

LostUSA · Rank #1213

Salzenstein won in 2 sets

Venue and conditions

At the match

Venue

Racquet Club of Memphis

Memphis, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

1.5vs last year

Altitude

94 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

7Salzenstein

6Kim

13 meetings

Hard 6–5Clay 1–1

MemphisQualifying R1 · 14 Feb 2004HardThis match
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kevin Kim
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Tallahassee ChallengerRound of 32 · 3 Apr 2006Hard
Kevin Kim
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 2
Dnepropetrovsk ChallengerRound of 16 · 17 Nov 2004Hard
Kevin Kim
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 0
Roland GarrosQualifying R2 · 22 May 2003Clay
Kevin Kim
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
Aptos ChallengerRound of 32 · 2003Hard
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁷Set 3: 7⁷
Kevin Kim
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁹Set 3: 6⁴
San Luis Potosi ChallengerRound of 16 · 2003Clay
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kevin Kim
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Explore player performance in the conditions, compare recent form and inspect the matches behind each number.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Explore Pro

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research