Michal Tabara vs Michael Berrer, Wolfsburg Challenger 2004, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Carpet · Sat 7 Feb

Final

Michal Tabara

WinnerRank #1290

Tabara won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 17–5

Set 23–6

Set 36–4

Michael Berrer

LostRank #952

Venue

Tennisclub Grün-Gold Wolfsburg

Wolfsburg, GER· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

33 km/h

Fresh

Humidity

82%

Humid

Temperature

12°C

Cool

Altitude

96 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Tabara

0Berrer

2 meetings

Carpet 1–0Hard 1–0

Wolfsburg ChallengerSemifinal · 7 Feb 2004CarpetThis match
Michal Tabara
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Michael Berrer
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 4
US OpenQualifying R3 · 27 Aug 2004Hard
Michal Tabara
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Michael Berrer
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Michal Tabara vs Michael Berrer, Wolfsburg Challenger 2004, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research