Michael Kohlmann vs Mariusz Fyrstenberg, Wroclaw Challenger 2004, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 5 Feb

Final

Michael Kohlmann

LostRank #1019

Fyrstenberg won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 14–6

Set 27–6³

Set 32–6

Mariusz Fyrstenberg

WinnerRank #1539

Venue

Centennial Hall

Wroclaw, POL· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

121 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

1Kohlmann

1Fyrstenberg

2 meetings

Hard 0–1Clay 1–0

Wroclaw ChallengerRound of 16 · 5 Feb 2004HardThis match
Mariusz Fyrstenberg
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6³Set 3: 6
Michael Kohlmann
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 2
BucharestQualifying R2 · 7 Sept 2003Clay
Michael Kohlmann
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 7⁷
Mariusz Fyrstenberg
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Michael Kohlmann vs Mariusz Fyrstenberg, Wroclaw Challenger 2004, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research