Markus Hantschk vs Philipp Kohlschreiber, Ischgl Challenger 2003, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Carpet · Wed 3 Dec

Final

Markus Hantschk

LostRank #1233

Kohlschreiber won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 22–6

Philipp Kohlschreiber

WinnerRank #779

Venue

Tennis Center Ischgl

Ischgl, AUT· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

88%

Very humid

Temperature

4°C

Cold

Altitude

1379 m

High

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Hantschk

1Kohlschreiber

2 meetings

Ischgl ChallengerRound of 16 · 3 Dec 2003CarpetThis match
Philipp Kohlschreiber
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Markus Hantschk
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Belgrade ChallengerRound of 32 · 2003Carpet
Markus Hantschk
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Philipp Kohlschreiber
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Markus Hantschk vs Philipp Kohlschreiber, Ischgl Challenger 2003, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research