Paul Goldstein vs Fred Hemmes, Champaign Challenger 2003, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Hard · Fri 21 Nov

Final

Paul Goldstein

WinnerRank #1120

Goldstein won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 14–6

Set 26–3

Set 36–2

Fred Hemmes

LostRank #1635

Venue

Atkins Tennis Center

Urbana, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

231 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

1Goldstein

1Hemmes

2 meetings

Champaign ChallengerSemifinal · 21 Nov 2003HardThis match
Paul Goldstein
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Fred Hemmes
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2
CopenhagenQualifying R2 · 23 Feb 2003Hard
Fred Hemmes
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Paul Goldstein
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Paul Goldstein vs Fred Hemmes, Champaign Challenger 2003, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research