Marcus Sarstrand vs Joachim Johansson, Nottingham 2003, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-4 3-6 6-3Venue and conditions
Nottingham Tennis CentreNottingham, GBR
Indoor hardCourt speed104.1Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
Altitude26 mSea level
Head to head
0Sarstrand
3Johansson
3 meetingsHard 0–2Clay 0–1
- NottinghamQuarterfinal · 30 Oct 2003HardThis matchJoachim JohanssonSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Marcus SarstrandSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
- GothenburgSemifinal · 2006HardJoachim JohanssonSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Marcus SarstrandSets won: 1Set 1: 65Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
- EdinburghQualifying R2 · 5 May 2002ClayJoachim JohanssonSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marcus SarstrandSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.