Hugo Armando vs Ricardo Mello, Quito Challenger 2003, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 9 Oct

Final

Hugo Armando

LostRank #1126

Mello won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 16–3

Set 22–6

Set 32–6

Ricardo Mello

WinnerRank #1018

Venue

Club de Tenis Buena Vista

Quito, ECU· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

10 km/h

Light

Humidity

94%

Very humid

Temperature

16°C

Mild

Altitude

2836 m

Very high

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Armando

1Mello

2 meetings

Quito ChallengerRound of 16 · 9 Oct 2003ClayThis match
Ricardo Mello
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Hugo Armando
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 2
San Luis Potosi ChallengerRound of 32 · 18 Mar 2008Clay
Hugo Armando
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Ricardo Mello
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6²Set 3: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Hugo Armando vs Ricardo Mello, Quito Challenger 2003, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research