Pavel Snobel vs Victor Hanescu, Metz 2003, Round of 32
Final score
Final
6-4 6-1
Venue and conditions
Les Arenes de MetzMetz, FRA
Indoor hardCourt speed107.1Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksAltitude171 mLow
Match stats
1h 6m4Aces3
0Double faults2
30Service points won40
8Service games played9
5Service games won9
9Return games played8
6/967%Break points saved100%5/5
0/50%Break points converted33%3/9
Head to head
0Snobel
4Hanescu
4 meetingsHard 0–2Clay 0–2
- MetzRound of 32 · 30 Sept 2003HardThis matchVictor HanescuSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Pavel SnobelSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
- DnepropetrovskRound of 32 · 10 Nov 2008HardVictor HanescuSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Pavel SnobelSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
- Rome 2Semifinal · 8 Oct 2004ClayVictor HanescuSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Pavel SnobelSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
- EstorilQualifying R2 · 6 Apr 2003ClayVictor HanescuSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Pavel SnobelSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.