Jan Vacek vs Arvind Parmar, Binghamton Challenger 2003, Round of 32

Challenger · Round of 32 · Hard · Wed 6 Aug

Final

Jan Vacek

LostRank #1155

Parmar won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 23–6

Arvind Parmar

WinnerRank #1507

Venue

Recreation Park tennis courts, Binghamton

Binghamton, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

11 km/h

Light

Humidity

89%

Very humid

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

262 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Vacek

1Parmar

2 meetings

Hard 0–1Carpet 1–0

Binghamton ChallengerRound of 32 · 6 Aug 2003HardThis match
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jan Vacek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
Prague 2 ChallengerRound of 16 · 20 Nov 2003Carpet
Jan Vacek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 7
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Vacek vs Arvind Parmar, Binghamton Challenger 2003, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research