Vincenzo Santopadre vs Nicolas Massu, Mantova 2003, Semifinal
Final score
Final
7-5 6-0
Venue and conditions
Società Canottieri MincioMantova, ITA
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Santopadre
1Massu
2 meetings- MantovaSemifinal · 2003ClayThis matchVincenzo SantopadreSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Nicolas MassuSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 0
- SzczecinRound of 16 · 18 Sept 2003ClayNicolas MassuSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 6Vincenzo SantopadreSets won: 1Set 1: 0Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Form and path
Vincenzo Santopadre2–4
MonterotondoClay
- LRound of 32Rogerio Dutra SilvaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Vincenzo SantopadreSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
FrascatiClay
- LQuarterfinalFrancesco PiccariSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Vincenzo SantopadreSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 3
- WRound of 16Vincenzo SantopadreSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Tobias KoeckSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
- WRound of 32Vincenzo SantopadreSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Yordan KanevSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 66
CataniaClay
- LRound of 32Yordan KanevSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Vincenzo SantopadreSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0
Nicolas Massu2–4
Manta CHHard
Rome 2 CHClay
Ostrava CHClay
Savannah CHClay
- LRound of 16Wayne OdesnikSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Nicolas MassuSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
Nicolas Massu · Retired
- WRound of 32Nicolas MassuSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 65Set 3: 7Denys MolchanovSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 64
- WQualifying R3Nicolas MassuSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Georgi Rumenov PayakovSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.