Jeff Salzenstein vs Peter Clarke, Atlantic City 2003, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
7-6(7) 6-1Venue and conditions
Ventnor City Tennis CourtsAtlantic City, USA
Outdoor hardCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Salzenstein
0Clarke
1 meeting- Atlantic CityQuarterfinal · 2003HardThis matchJeff SalzensteinSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Peter ClarkeSets won: 0Set 1: 67Set 2: 1
Form and path
Jeff Salzenstein4–2
HoustonClay
Tallahassee CHHard
- LRound of 32Jesse WittenSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Jeff SalzensteinSets won: 0Set 1: 64Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R3Jeff SalzensteinSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Phillip KingSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R2Jeff SalzensteinSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Bjorn RehnquistSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 65
- WQualifying R1Jeff SalzensteinSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Lesley JosephSets won: 0Set 1: 66Set 2: 2
Peter Clarke2–4
Caloundra CHHard
CangguHard
- WRound of 32Peter ClarkeSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6Stephen DonaldSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
JakartaHard
- LRound of 32Ikaika JobeSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Peter ClarkeSets won: 0Set 1: 65Set 2: 610
Porto TorresHard
- LRound of 32Andrea AgazziSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 6Peter ClarkeSets won: 1Set 1: 61Set 2: 7Set 3: 3
FoxhillsHard
- LSemifinalSatoshi IwabuchiSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Peter ClarkeSets won: 0Set 1: 64Set 2: 66
- WQuarterfinalPeter ClarkeSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Thomas OgerSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.