Tomas Behrend vs Giorgio Galimberti, Barletta 2003, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-2 6-3Venue and conditions
Circolo Tennis Hugo SimmenBarletta, ITA
ClayCourt speed90.0Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
2Behrend
1Galimberti
3 meetingsClay 2–0Hard 0–1
- BarlettaRound of 16 · 2003ClayThis matchTomas BehrendSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Giorgio GalimbertiSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- ViennaQualifying R1 · 4 Oct 2003HardGiorgio GalimbertiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Tomas BehrendSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
- SofiaQuarterfinal · 2002ClayTomas BehrendSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 7Giorgio GalimbertiSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
Form and path
Tomas Behrend3–3
Dresden CHClay
MunichClay
- LQualifying R3Tobias SummererSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Tomas BehrendSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- WQualifying R2Tomas BehrendSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 7Jean Rene LisnardSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 64
- WQualifying R1Tomas BehrendSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Tobias KamkeSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
Giorgio Galimberti3–3
LagosHard
- LRound of 32Hiroki KondoSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Giorgio GalimbertiSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 0
- WQualifying R2Giorgio GalimbertiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Etido UdofaSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0
- WQualifying R1Giorgio GalimbertiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Arinze AdirikaSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0
TriesteClay
- LRound of 16Filippo LeonardiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Giorgio GalimbertiSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 64
- WRound of 32Giorgio GalimbertiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Erik CrepaldiSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 64
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.