Regis Lavergne vs Thomas Dupre, Cherbourg Challenger 2003, Qualifying R3

Challenger · Qualifying R3 · Hard · Mon 24 Feb

Final

Regis Lavergne

LostRank #1201

Dupre won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 24–6

Thomas Dupre

WinnerRank #1439

Venue

Complexe Jean Jaures

Cherbourg, FRA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

25 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Head to head

0Lavergne

1Dupre

1 meeting

Cherbourg ChallengerQualifying R3 · 24 Feb 2003HardThis match
Thomas Dupre
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Regis Lavergne
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Form and path

Regis Lavergne1–1

Cherbourg CHThis week

WQualifying R2
Regis Lavergne
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gilles Kremer
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

Andrezieux CHHard

Thomas Dupre

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Regis Lavergne vs Thomas Dupre, Cherbourg Challenger 2003, Qualifying R3

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research