Cedric Kauffmann vs Eric Nunez, Champaign Challenger 2002, Qualifying R2

Challenger · Qualifying R2 · Hard · Sun 17 Nov

Final

Cedric Kauffmann

LostRank #1270

Nunez won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 10–6

Set 27–6³

Set 33–6

Eric Nunez

WinnerRank #1045

Venue

Atkins Tennis Center

Urbana, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

231 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

0Kauffmann

1Nunez

1 meeting

Champaign ChallengerQualifying R2 · 17 Nov 2002HardThis match
Eric Nunez
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6³Set 3: 6
Cedric Kauffmann
Sets won: 1Set 1: 0Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 3

Form and path

Cedric Kauffmann1–2

Dallas CHHard

Australian OpenHard

LQualifying R1
Tomas Behrend
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Cedric Kauffmann
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 3

Eric Nunez

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Cedric Kauffmann vs Eric Nunez, Champaign Challenger 2002, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research