Michal Tabara vs Jan Stancik, Bratislava 2002, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
6-0 7-5Venue and conditions
Incheba Expo — indoor tournament hallsBratislava, SVK
CarpetCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Head to head
2Tabara
0Stancik
2 meetingsCarpet 1–0Clay 1–0
- BratislavaQualifying R1 · 2 Nov 2002CarpetThis matchMichal TabaraSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Jan StancikSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 5
- ViennaSemifinal · 2008ClayMichal TabaraSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Jan StancikSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.