Alex Kim vs Robert Kendrick, Tyler 2002, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-4 6-3Venue and conditions
Tyler Tennis & Swim ClubTyler, USA
Outdoor hardCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Kim
3Kendrick
4 meetings- TylerRound of 16 · 2002HardThis matchRobert KendrickSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alex KimSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
- TarzanaRound of 32 · 2002HardRobert KendrickSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alex KimSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
- KerrvilleSemifinal · 2001HardAlex KimSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Robert KendrickSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 3
- TarzanaRound of 16 · 2001HardRobert KendrickSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alex KimSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
Form and path
Alex Kim3–3
Los AngelesHard
Roland GarrosClay
Forest Hills CHClay
- LQualifying R3Brian BakerSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Alex KimSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 3
- WQualifying R2Alex KimSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jimy SzymanskiSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R1Alex KimSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Huntley MontgomerySets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 2
Robert Kendrick2–4
Indian Wells MastersHard
Sacramento CHHard
Panama City CHClay
EastbourneGrass
- LQualifying R3Marinko MatosevicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Robert KendrickSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R2Robert KendrickSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Matthias BachingerSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5
- WQualifying R1Robert KendrickSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Daniel SmethurstSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.