Gilles Elseneer vs Martin Verkerk, Nottingham 2002, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
3-6 6-0 6-3Venue and conditions
Nottingham Tennis CentreNottingham, GBR
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Elseneer
0Verkerk
1 meeting- NottinghamQuarterfinal · 2002ClayThis matchGilles ElseneerSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Martin VerkerkSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 0Set 3: 3
Form and path
Gilles Elseneer1–5
Andrezieux CHHard
Mons CHHard
Grenoble CHHard
FelixstoweGrass
- LRound of 32Josh GoodallSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 7Gilles ElseneerSets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 66
Martin Verkerk2–4
Tarragona CHClay
Bucharest CHClay
Scheveningen CHClay
KasselClay
- WFinalMartin VerkerkSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Felipe ParadaSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 611
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.